Category Archives: FOREX

Demonitization-Gurumurthy Take

Gurmurthy piece in The Hindu

His contention:

The balloon of HDN was expanding in dangerous proportions. This needed to be reined, otherwise Indian Economy was doomed by 2021. This was a reset.

The growth during UPA years was jobless growth powered by HDN, via high asset price and high private consumption.

Interestingly he faults Govt late introduction of Income declaration scheme late in the day, otherwise this could have fetched 2-3 lacs Cr in tax.

Now he states 45K Cr is black money is already unearthed and 2.9 lacs Cr in under scanner, the yield is far more than any earlier income declaration.

Following demonetisation, there are 56 lakh more assessees, advance tax receipts have gone up by 42% and self-assessment tax risen by 34%. It has also led to an attack on benami assets. Even as intelligence agencies note a 50% drop in hawala-related calls post demonetisation, nearly 2.24 lakh shell companies that have been used for hawala have been uncovered; 35,000 have been found laundering ₹17,000 crore; one of them, ₹2,484 crore.

Everyone has their numbers.

 

 

Advertisements

Rajan 2.0

More from AV Rajwade

In the last article, I had referred to the fact that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) targeting approach has led to double-digit interest rates for the business sector, given that the Wholesale Price Index is a better index of inflation in that sector. Real interest rates are all the more important for the health of capital-intensive businesses and, arguably, the very high real rates have contributed to the sharp rise in the non-performing assets (NPA) of the banking industry, a matter of serious concern to both the banking supervisor and the owner of 70 per cent of Indian banking. And, with the latest CPI figure, there are few prospects of lower rates in the near future. One also believes that given its composition, the CPI is far more influenced by the international commodity prices and, in India, the rain gods, than by monetary policy. The demographic profile of an economy is also important: Japan and Europe, with their ageing populations, are finding it difficult to meet inflation targets, despite years of effort.

Turning now to the other price of money, namely the exchange rate, in a speech in Singapore last month, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Raghuram Rajan emphasised that “depreciation in the rupee essentially matches inflation differentials and therefore anybody who invests at rupee rates gets appropriate returns to match the kind of depreciation risk that they have taken”: in other words, the exchange rate for the Indian rupee is determined by the good old purchasing power parity theory of exchange rates. I have some major reservations on the argument made:

  • Empirical evidence does not support that inflation differential is the sole – or even the primary – determinant of the exchange rates, even on a year-to-year basis.
  • The Real Effective Exchange Rate index prepared by the International Monetary Fund (and used by Rajan in his Ramnath Goenka lecture in March) evidences a rupee appreciation of 20 per cent from September 2013 to January 2016, clearly not what PPP needs.
  • The very fact that the foreign portfolio investor (FPI) quota in the bond market was not fully used recently as prospects of a rate cut have dimmed suggests that the FPIs’ primary objective is not so much the yield or inflation differential as capital gains through interest rate movements. In fact, the popularity of “carry trades” in currency markets, and also with Indian companies with foreign currency debt, suggests that in the era of a liberal capital account, exchange rate levels, on their own, do not move to reflect inflation/interest rate differentials, even over years.

In a recent Project Syndicate article, Rajan has ridiculed critics of the exchange rate policy by saying that “interpretation is in the eye of the beholder”. While each analyst of the economy has his/her own beliefs, and tends to give more importance to data supporting them (“confirmation bias” in the jargon of behavioural economics), surely this is equally true of policymakers? One example: In the same article, he argues that “over the past year, as goods exports have slowed, the real effective exchange rate has been rather flat”. The slowdown, net of petroleum, oil and lubricants exports, is marginal. On the other hand, the merchandise trade deficit has remained at around $140/150 billion for three years, despite the sharp fall in oil prices from June 2014, which should have reduced it significantly. This apart, the output loss on the external account, measured as current account net of secondary income, particularly private remittances (which are not the domestic economy’s earnings), is as high as six per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). And, the net external liabilities have jumped seven times in seven years to $350 billion plus, despite the record level of reserves. Of the external liabilities, $80 billion represents short-term trade credits. And, $220 billion of portfolio investments are potentially short-term. How long can our excess consumption continue?

In the article, he also spells out his idea of an ideal exchange rate: “It is the ‘Goldilocks rate’ produced by market forces, with RBI focusing on attracting long-term capital inflows and intervening only to maintain orderly movement of the rupee versus other currencies.” Is this a realistic proposition?

To come back to another term for Rajan, the recent intemperate letter from Subramanian Swamy and the cult status he seems to have assumed among business leaders would probably ensure the government offers him one. If he decides to accept the offer, will he undertake a zero-based review of both the monetary and exchange rate policies before the ever-increasing NPAs and net external liabilities overwhelm us?

Emerging Market should go for Gold

Prof. Rogoff has this(Project Syndicate) take on the balance sheet of central banks in Emerging Markets. He suggests that Emerging Markets should reduce the share of hard currency( Dollar, pounds), and should start shifting some reserve to gold. His argument are:

1.Since all the emerging market are running after the G-Sec of advanced countries, thus driving there interest rates down. They could shift to gold thus reducing dependence of G-Secs, this would help increase the interest rates on their bond. Since the returns on gold is almost same as the return on short term securities, so no loss of interest income there.

2. Also he recommends emerging countries, to pool resources and store gold at one location, may be at New York Fed.  But this would require a lot of trust between the nations.

Though I would politely disagree with it. Unless we are expecting Apocalypse, its better we have our reserve in hard currency.

  1. Definitely gold is a stable long term asset, but in medium run and short run, it has got remarkable volatility. As a central bank the mandate is not to make profit by interest income but rather to stabilize the currency against any external shock. For that its better to have hard currency or G-Sec as reserve.
  2. Majority of trade is still invoiced in $. In fact 75% of 100$ bills circulate outside USA. Most of the debt raised by emerging countries is again denominated in $. So to provide backstop against any eventuality, they better be hoarding $ rather then any other other thing. It actually help in better planning also.

China easing capital controls to internationalize Yuan

The SDR, an accounting unit usually deployed in bailout packages, would deliver few direct benefits to China’s 1.3 billion people. 

ET Article

This is going to defining theme for next decade as far as international finance is concerned.

Given the out sized influence US exerts because of USD being international currency. Recent slowdown notwithstanding, China has the potential for the International Currency:

Though lot needs to be done regarding depth and openness of financial markets.